Use your favourite features in-game with our Desktop AppLoL Tier List for All Roles, Platinum+
| Current patch | 25.24 |
| Last updated | 22 days ago |
Based on the matches analyzed in Patch 25.24, the top 5 highest win rate champions up to low Diamond are Swain Bot, Brand Bot, Briar Jungle, Garen Mid, and Nilah Bot. By picking and mastering these champions, you will have a much higher chance of winning games in the current patch. Furthermore, if you're interested in tier list curated by our high elo players, please refer to our low elo and high elo tier lists.
Rank | Role | Champion | Changes | Tier | Win | Pick | Ban | Matches | Counters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |  |  | — |  Great | 50.1% | 10.8% | 9.2% | 482 285 |      | ||
2 | |  | — |  Good | 49.8% | 10.0% | 2.9% | 446 029 |    | ||
3 | | | — |  Optimal | 52.7% | 9.3% | 1.6% | 417 815 |    | ||
4 | |  | — |  Situational | 49.2% | 9.3% | 10.7% | 415 454 |   | ||
5 | | | — | Great | 51.2% | 8.2% | 8.0% | 368 034 |  | ||
6 | | | — | Great | 51.2% | 7.9% | 25.8% | 355 956 |   | ||
7 | | | — | Optimal | 53.1% | 7.1% | 5.2% | 318 641 |  | ||
8 | |  | — | Good | 49.8% | 6.9% | 6.3% | 309 838 | | ||
9 | |  | — |  Not Good | 48.9% | 6.4% | 12.0% | 287 277 |  | ||
10 | |  | — | Good | 50.5% | 5.9% | 2.5% | 265 787 | | ||
11 | | | — | Situational | 49.7% | 5.7% | 13.6% | 254 987 | | ||
12 | | | — | Great | 51.0% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 238 827 | | ||
13 | |  | — | Not Good | 46.2% | 5.3% | 56.6% | 237 552 | | ||
14 | |  | — | Good | 50.3% | 5.3% | 0.9% | 235 720 | | ||
15 | | | — | Great | 52.3% | 4.9% | 4.6% | 218 933 | | ||
16 | | | — | Great | 52.1% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 215 436 | | ||
17 | | | — | Great | 52.2% | 4.6% | 2.1% | 204 211 | | ||
18 | | | — | Good | 51.1% | 4.5% | 2.1% | 201 510 |  | ||
19 | | | — | Good | 51.0% | 4.2% | 8.1% | 189 289 |  | ||
20 | |  | — | Situational | 49.5% | 4.2% | 0.6% | 187 656 | | ||
21 | |  | — | Not Good | 48.1% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 186 970 | | ||
22 | |  | — | Not Good | 49.3% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 173 272 | | ||
23 | | | — | Situational | 50.1% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 166 268 | | ||
24 | |  | — | Not Good | 48.6% | 3.5% | 1.1% | 156 169 | | ||
25 | | | — | Great | 51.7% | 3.4% | 1.5% | 151 316 | | ||
26 | |  | — | Situational | 50.1% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 141 969 | | ||
27 | |  | — | Not Good | 48.7% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 135 075 | | ||
28 | | | — | Not Good | 49.0% | 2.9% | 0.3% | 128 797 | | ||
29 | | | — | Great | 52.2% | 2.4% | 0.3% | 108 558 | | ||
30 | | | — | Good | 51.2% | 2.4% | 2.0% | 105 427 | | ||
31 | |  | — | Not Good | 49.2% | 2.3% | 0.7% | 104 698 | | ||
32 | | | — | Great | 52.5% | 2.3% | 0.1% | 102 525 | | ||
33 | | | — | Good | 51.5% | 2.1% | 0.6% | 92 936 | | ||
34 | |  | — | Great | 51.8% | 1.9% | 33.0% | 84 462 | | ||
35 | | | — | Good | 51.2% | 1.9% | 0.2% | 83 402 | | ||
36 | |  | — | Great | 52.7% | 1.7% | 18.9% | 76 507 | | ||
37 | |  | — | Not Good | 48.4% | 1.6% | 35.9% | 69 603 | | ||
38 | | | — | Great | 52.3% | 1.4% | 0.3% | 63 580 | | ||
39 | |  | — | Not Good | 46.1% | 1.3% | 5.9% | 58 473 | | ||
40 | |  | — | Not Good | 49.7% | 1.1% | 22.3% | 51 073 | | ||