Use your favourite features in-game with our Desktop AppLoL Tier List for All Roles, Platinum+
| Current patch | 25.24 |
| Last updated | 14 days ago |
Based on the matches analyzed in Patch 25.24, the top 5 highest win rate champions up to low Diamond are Swain Bot, Briar Jungle, Brand Bot, Garen Mid, and Nilah Bot. By picking and mastering these champions, you will have a much higher chance of winning games in the current patch. Furthermore, if you're interested in tier list curated by our high elo players, please refer to our low elo and high elo tier lists.
Rank | Role | Champion | Changes | Tier | Win | Pick | Ban | Matches | Counters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |  |  | — |  Great | 51.1% | 11.2% | 9.8% | 376 955 |      | ||
2 | |  | — |  Good | 49.5% | 9.6% | 23.3% | 323 310 |    | ||
3 | |  | — |  Situational | 48.7% | 9.3% | 10.4% | 311 790 | | ||
4 | |  | — | Great | 50.7% | 8.0% | 7.1% | 270 351 |   | ||
5 | |  | — | Good | 49.9% | 7.0% | 16.3% | 236 425 | | ||
6 | |  | — | Great | 51.4% | 6.7% | 8.4% | 223 659 |   | ||
7 | | | — | Great | 51.3% | 6.1% | 27.9% | 204 963 |   | ||
8 | | | — |  Optimal | 52.7% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 190 337 | | ||
9 | | | — | Optimal | 53.7% | 5.6% | 12.3% | 189 111 |  | ||
10 | |  | — | Good | 50.0% | 5.4% | 14.2% | 183 046 |  | ||
11 | | | — | Great | 52.2% | 5.4% | 10.7% | 182 689 | | ||
12 | |  | — | Good | 50.7% | 5.1% | 8.1% | 171 903 |  | ||
13 | |  | — | Situational | 49.6% | 5.1% | 36.7% | 171 229 |  | ||
14 | |  | — | Situational | 49.8% | 5.0% | 2.8% | 166 333 | | ||
15 | | | — | Situational | 49.5% | 4.8% | 2.3% | 161 812 | | ||
16 | |  | — | Good | 50.8% | 4.6% | 1.2% | 154 977 | | ||
17 | | | — | Optimal | 52.7% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 142 455 | | ||
18 | | | — | Optimal | 52.7% | 3.9% | 13.9% | 131 174 | | ||
19 | | | — | Good | 51.0% | 3.8% | 2.9% | 127 705 |  | ||
20 | | | — | Good | 50.8% | 3.8% | 1.8% | 127 447 | | ||
21 | |  | — |  Not Good | 45.4% | 3.7% | 2.2% | 124 292 | | ||
22 | | | — | Good | 50.6% | 3.7% | 1.3% | 123 487 | | ||
23 | |  | — | Not Good | 47.9% | 3.6% | 23.6% | 119 453 | | ||
24 | |  | — | Not Good | 48.9% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 108 665 | | ||
25 | |  | — | Not Good | 49.4% | 3.2% | 47.6% | 108 328 |  | ||
26 | | | — | Good | 50.9% | 3.0% | 0.8% | 100 133 | | ||
27 | | | — | Great | 51.9% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 98 894 | | ||
28 | | | — | Not Good | 48.7% | 2.5% | 1.0% | 82 430 | | ||
29 | |  | — | Not Good | 44.2% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 82 302 | | ||
30 | | | — | Situational | 50.4% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 81 273 | | ||
31 | | | — | Situational | 50.0% | 2.4% | 5.7% | 80 142 | | ||
32 | | | — | Situational | 50.2% | 2.3% | 1.0% | 77 608 | | ||
33 | |  | — | Not Good | 49.2% | 2.3% | 1.0% | 77 578 | | ||
34 | | | — | Good | 50.9% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 73 759 | | ||
35 | | | — | Great | 52.3% | 2.2% | 5.3% | 72 523 | | ||
36 | | | — | Situational | 49.8% | 2.2% | 0.3% | 72 289 | | ||
37 | | | — | Good | 50.8% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 71 604 | | ||
38 | |  | — | Not Good | 49.7% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 67 763 | | ||
39 | |  | — | Situational | 50.4% | 2.0% | 0.5% | 66 677 | | ||
40 | |  | — | Not Good | 47.1% | 2.0% | 0.8% | 65 617 | | ||