Cephalopod’s LoR Tournament Lineup Construction Manual

Cephalopod’s LoR Tournament Lineup Construction Manual

Cephalopod’s Tournament Lineup Construction Manual

As the person who’s played the most tournament Runeterra, it’s my pleasure to demystify the art of tournament lineup construction and share the process I use for figuring out what to play!

Tournament vs Ranked Differences

I spend most of my LoR playtime participating in grassroots tournaments, but I’m definitely in the minority on that! If you’re coming from the ladder or even gauntlet, then here are the main things to be prepared for when diving into tournament play:

  1. The Riot lock (3 decks 1 ban best of 3, unique champs and region combinations) format affords quite a bit of leeway to play things that lose to top meta decks. If all of your decks hard lose to Ahri/Kennen, that’s not really even a weakness since you can simply ban it away and play against their other decks.
  2. The level of play is stronger, and there’s much very few actual bad decks being played. The off-meta decks that do see play are mostly direct answers to specific meta decks. As a result, you’re much less able to coast by with 55% winrate ladder decks such as Pirates or Lurk.
  3. Tournaments take an entire day! Whereas you can pop in and out of ranked throughout your weekend, you’ll need to block out an entire day to play in a tournament. An extension of this idea is the fact that as the tournament progresses later into the day, you’ll need to stay focused and keep playing well. The farther in you make it the more difficult it is to play accurately, but something as easy as taking a few minutes between rounds to exercise or snack can help you not fall apart later in the day.

Pantheon level 1 (lor splash)

An aside before we start:

  • This is my method for finding the optimal lineup in a given meta environment, and doesn’t take into account comfort picks or personal preference whatsoever.
  • I’ll pick out three decks beforehand and learn them for (or during!) a tournament, but it’s worth noting that it’s always reasonable to play what you’re comfortable on over decks that might give you a slight advantage. If you’re a die-hard Deep enjoyer, then that’s 100% fine to bring to your tournament.
  • There truly aren’t any decks that aren’t bring-able to a tournament setting the ban allows for a lot more playable decks than the ladder does.

Matching Matchups

The most important factor when constructing a lineup – if you take one thing away from this article, let it be this – is to bring three decks with a similar matchup spread against the top few meta contenders.

Every deck either wants to beat or ban other decks depending on whether their matchup with them is favored or unfavored, and your job is to pair decks together that have a cohesive idea of what to ban and what to farm.

An extremely common misconception is thinking that this means you should aim to have three of the same sort of deck, be it triple aggro, triple control, triple Demacia, etc.

The only thing that matters is the matchups. If you have a hyper control deck and a hyper aggro deck that have their good and bad matchups in common, they’re a perfect fit together.

Targeting

In a best of three, having everything you bring be strong against a particular deck is a valuable strength, since that deck will struggle to find a win even with a ban. And since you need to win with each unbanned deck to win the set, it’s all about the weakest link.

Targeting comes in two forms: hard targeting and soft targeting. The former is when you go all in finding the most devastating possible matchups for one deck with little regard for your other matchups, and the latter is a less committal version where you simply try to be favored against your target.

burgeoning sentinel (lor splash)

For open tournaments, soft targeting is always preferred, since the field will bring a variety of decks, and even if one deck is a meta menace, you’ll have to play against opponents who decided not to bring it.

Inside a more insular environment where you have more information about your opposition, such as an invitational or a top32, hard targeting becomes a more viable strategy. A great example is 4LW’s Lee Sin hard target lineup (Ahri/Kennen + Tree + Soraka) from this week’s Fight Night.

Actually Building An Example Lineup

That was a lot of speaking in generalities and heuristics, but how does all of this actually get put into practice? Let’s go step by step and build a lineup for this coming seasonal tournament!

As a first step, I usually start with a single deck that I enjoy playing or have been impressed with. For this season I’ve found Iceborn Spiders to be very powerful and quite fun to play. Knowing all of your matchups is paramount, so if you don’t know them then a good place to look is lor.mobalytics.gg/stats/archetypes if you have Mobalytics Plus.

The Lineup Manifesto stats 1

Taking a look at the matchup table, Iceborn Spiders is fairly well-rounded but definitely would prefer to ban Pantheon, Poros, Lee, and Viego. Leaving up Ahri/Kennen and banning Pantheon is a fairly specific requirement to meet for other decks, but Scouts fits the bill perfectly. Naturally, the matchup tables aren’t identical, but the important features of hard losing and hard winning matchups line up, making for a great fit.

The Lineup Manifesto stats 2

Here we’ve reached the ubiquitous situation of having a very promising lineup consisting of only two decks. In reality, there are usually tens of viable options to run as the third and you’ll need to make a choice where there isn’t a clear answer.

For our example, the candidates I’d consider are Darkness, Poros, Thralls, Xerath/Zilean, Ahri/Kennen, and Nami/TF. The two core facets of the lineup up to this point have been to leave Ahri up and ban Pantheon, but the two decks we have so far also boast strong win rates against SI control of both SI/FR and Darkness varieties.

If you have time to practice with a partner or team before the event, I’d recommend test-driving candidate third decks into the decks you expect to be left up and nail down specific card choices at this stage.

My testing showed that even though it had a low sample size, Nami/TF had exactly the characteristics I was looking for: Bad against Pantheon, passable against the common aggressive Ahri counters, and good against SI control and Ahri.

Here’s the finished lineup!

Iceborn Spiders

Iceborn Spiders (LoR Deck)

Deck Code: CEBQCAYBAYBACAIDAYDQCBIBEQUCWMJSGUBACAYBAIBQCBIZDUQQEAIEAEFACBAFDU

[See Iceborn Spiders deck details]

Scouts

Scouts (LoR Deck)

Deck Code: CIDACAYABYAQIAACAECQMAICAIAAEBQDAEAAMCI5AMBAMFR2HYAQGAQAA4EQUAIBAEACK

[See Scouts deck details]

Nami/TF

Nami TF (LoR Deck)

Deck Code: CICQCAYGCEAQKBQFAIBAMGRLAMAQIAIQGQCAGBAFBUJBSAYBAECCOAIEAQDQCBIGBMAQCAQGEY

[See Nami/TF deck details]

Conclusion

Building a cohesive lineup with a plan for what to target and ban takes a bit of preparatory effort, but it’ll certainly help you win more matches.

When facing the three current strongest decks, if you’re soft targeting two of them and banning the third, then you can be heavily favored even with decks on a much lower power level than your opponent’s.

Defeating opponents in pick ban before you even get into the game is the goal, and this method will help achieve exactly that!

For more decks, head to the Deck Library! To build your own, head to the Deck Builder.